Zhang, M., Ying, J., Song, G., Fung, D.Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. The black swan: The impact of the highly improbable (vol. Fooled by randomness: The hidden role of chance in life and in the markets (vol. 2010 Catalyst census: Fortune 500 women board directors. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 5(4), 461–476. The ultimate attribution error: Extending Allport’s cognitive analysis of prejudice. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175–220. Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Clinical efficacy of attentional bias modification procedures: An updated meta‐analysis.
The drunkard’s walk: How randomness rules our lives. What’s in a name: Exposing gender bias in student ratings of teaching. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29(3), 299. Beauty is talent: Task evaluation as a function of the performer’s physical attractiveness. Wang (Ed.), Oxford handbook of retirement (pp. The middle term is said to be bdhita or sublated, which means that it appears to be a valid reason but is contradicted by a more reliable source of knowledge. Effective financial planning for retirement. A Bdhit fallacy occurs when the middle term in an inference (the hetu or reason) is contradicted not through inference, but by direct perception or a piece of stronger evidence. Attention bias modification for social anxiety: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Books About Logical FallaciesĪ few books to help you get a real handle on logical fallacies. By doing so, one can more effectively evaluate arguments and engage in rational discourse, leading to more accurate and reliable conclusions. To avoid falling prey to logical fallacies, it is essential to develop critical thinking skills and a solid understanding of the principles of logic and argumentation. Logical fallacies can be difficult to identify, as they often involve seemingly reasonable arguments that, upon closer examination, reveal underlying flaws. Formal fallacies involve errors in the structure or form of an argument, while informal fallacies arise from errors in the content, context, or delivery of the argument. There are two main types of logical fallacies: formal and informal. They undermine the strength and credibility of an argument, making it difficult to persuade others or arrive at accurate judgments. These mistakes in reasoning can be both intentional and unintentional, often leading to false or misleading conclusions. It's important to be aware of these fallacies in order to critically evaluate arguments and avoid being misled. They are often used to mislead or distract from the truth, or to win an argument by appealing to emotions rather than reason. Logical fallacies are errors in reasoning or argumentation that can undermine the validity of an argument. Ad Hominem * Ambiguity * Anecdotal * Appeal to Authority * Appeal to Emotion * Appeal to Nature * Appeal to Ridicule Appeal to Tradition Argument from Repetition Argumentum ad Populum Bandwagon * Begging the Question * Burden of Proof * Circular Reasoning * Continuum Fallacy Equivocation * Etymological Fallacy * Fallacy Fallacy * Fallacy of Composition and Division * Fallacy of Quoting Out of Context False Cause & False Attribution * False Dilemma * Furtive Fallacy Gambler's Fallacy * Genetic Fallacy * Ignoratio Elenchi Incomplete Comparison Inflation of Conflict Kettle Logic Loaded Question * Middle Ground * No True Scotsman * Personal Incredulity * Proof by Verbosity Proving Too Much Red Herring * Reification Retrospective Determinism Shotgun Argumentation Slippery Slope * Special Pleading * Strawman * Texas Sharpshooter * Tu Quoque * What are Logical Fallacies?
0 kommentar(er)
